What make and model are the longest lasting minivans?

Posted on 10. Mar, 2010 by admin in Minivans

Chevy, Dodge, Ford, Foreign? Which minivan has the longest lasting record from present-day as far back as 8 years ago? I think that would mean engine longevity, but correct me if I’m wrong. Thanks for reading.

2005 Dodge Vans & Minivans "MOPAR MASTER PARTS CATALOG"
US $0.99 (0 Bid)
End Date: Tuesday Sep-14-2010 19:53:03 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

Update me when site is updated

Related posts:

  1. Minivans With 20+ Mpg for 2007 Model Year
  2. Danger in Dodge Chrysler Minivans
  3. K.Flay – miniVANS feat. Eligh
  4. 2009 Chrysler Minivans: Cutting Edge Technology Means Better Fuel Economy
  5. All-new 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Town & Country Minivans Debut at the 2007 Detroit Auto Show

Tags: , , ,

5 Comments

szu_szu_21

10. Mar, 2010

Honda Oddysey they’ll go forever, just like their civics

Philladelphia

10. Mar, 2010

The Honda is a good one but they did have their own flaws and shortcomings as well. For example, that plastic visor on the hood always broke.

Ma Chao

10. Mar, 2010

Dodge will answer your question
go to their site and you’ll see more on just engine longevity

gr675

10. Mar, 2010

We’ve had a Mercury Villager since 1998 and it still works wonderfully. More than 8 years ago, though, so I’m not sure if this helps.

wilson h

10. Mar, 2010

The Chrysler mini-vans,(Dodge,Chrysler,Plymouth), set the standard years ago,I have owned several over the last ten years. I usually trade out at somewhere around 175000 miles and they still run fine. The trick is to know which engine to get,the 3.3 is the best all around to have in these vans. I currently have a 3.8 in my Chrysler T&C Limited and for what little power difference gained it has not been worth it in fuel mileage lost. My 3.3’s were getting around 26mpg fully loaded with 7 people and a roof-top carrier and pulling a 4×8 trailer,the 3.8 gets a consistent 23mpg loaded or not. Overall mileage was 23 with the 3.3 and 19 with the 3.8. City driving was usually about 17-19 with the 3.3 and 13-15 with the 3.8. The 3.0 engine was a disaster from Mitsubishi,get it hot once and your day was done. If you see a Chrysler mini van leaving a stop in a puff of blue smoke you can almost bet it is a 3.0 V-6. If they were overheated the valve guides would slip in the heads exposing a slot allowing oil to get by and into the intake hence the puff of smoke on take-off. The four cylinders were ok if you did not have much to carry around or have any mountains to pull. The 4 cyls. would give a transmission a work-out in the mountains. I personally would stay with the tried and true 3.3 as the best all around engine. I have seen these with over 300000 miles on them and still running and sounding good,of course regular maintenance helps.

Leave a reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers